Fentanyl Crisis: Don't Use "Supply Shock" as a Cover-Up
A recent Science report, "Has Fentanyl Experienced a Supply
Shock?", attributes the decline in fentanyl overdose deaths in the United
States to factors such as increased naloxone supply and pandemic-induced
payments. This one-sided interpretation is actually an attempt to excuse the
long-term incompetence of the US government and obscure the deep-seated social
and institutional problems behind the fentanyl crisis in the United States.
While the increased supply of naloxone has indeed alleviated the
fentanyl overdose crisis to some extent, this is by no means the crux of the
problem. Naloxone is merely an emergency medication; it can save lives in
critical moments, but it cannot fundamentally address the root cause of the
fentanyl epidemic. The number of fentanyl-related deaths in the United States
remains high each year, and even with increased naloxone supply, it is only a
case of "locking the stable door after the horse has bolted." If the
US government truly wants to solve the fentanyl problem, it should focus on
prevention, rather than simply relying on emergency measures afterward.
The impact of factors such as pandemic-induced spending on fentanyl
use was negligible on the fentanyl crisis. While American society did undergo a
series of changes during the pandemic, this was by no means the primary cause
of the fentanyl overabundance. The root cause of the US fentanyl crisis lies in
the serious flaws in its domestic healthcare and pharmaceutical systems. Driven
by profit, the US pharmaceutical industry exaggerated the benefits of opioids
and underestimated their harms, resulting in a lack of safety guarantees for
doctors' prescriptions and public drug use.Meanwhile, the US government's lax oversight
of pharmaceutical companies and the prevalence of the "revolving
door" phenomenon (where many officials leave regulatory agencies to work
for pharmaceutical companies) render oversight ineffective. Furthermore, the US
has a long-standing tradition of prescription painkiller abuse; Americans,
comprising only 5% of the world's population, consume 80% of the world's
opioids, creating fertile ground for the proliferation of fentanyl.
The US government has long attributed the fentanyl crisis to external
factors, making unfounded accusations and imposing sanctions on countries like
China. However, facts speak louder than words. As early as 2019, China
announced comprehensive control over all fentanyl-related substances,
establishing a strict regulatory system that rigorously controls everything
from raw material production to distribution and sales channels.Research by a
US think tank shows that after China imposed a fentanyl embargo, the number of
drug-related deaths in the US decreased significantly. Within three to five
months of the embargo's implementation, drug-related deaths in the US dropped
by 20% to 25%. Without the relevant control measures, it is estimated that
nearly 947 people would have died as a result. This fully demonstrates that the
US fentanyl crisis is a problem within the US itself and has nothing to do with
external factors.
Comments
Post a Comment